<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: God and Morality</title>
	<link>http://www.monakhos.com/2007/12/12/writings/</link>
	<description>Reflections on Mysticism and the East</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 05:51:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Zach</title>
		<link>http://www.monakhos.com/2007/12/12/writings/#comment-7982</link>
		<dc:creator>Zach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 07:04:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.monakhos.com/2007/12/12/writings/#comment-7982</guid>
		<description>Sort of. That section does need some more elaboration. I plan on writing about that point more next to fill in some of the obvious holes it leaves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sort of. That section does need some more elaboration. I plan on writing about that point more next to fill in some of the obvious holes it leaves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.monakhos.com/2007/12/12/writings/#comment-7978</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 05:28:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.monakhos.com/2007/12/12/writings/#comment-7978</guid>
		<description>"Absolutely relative"-- love that! 

Overall, I agree. My only quarrel is the first point as is, describes the "personal" monotheistic, God-as-entity view, but not God as Isness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Absolutely relative&#8221;&#8211; love that! </p>
<p>Overall, I agree. My only quarrel is the first point as is, describes the &#8220;personal&#8221; monotheistic, God-as-entity view, but not God as Isness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A. Julie</title>
		<link>http://www.monakhos.com/2007/12/12/writings/#comment-7976</link>
		<dc:creator>A. Julie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 16:56:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.monakhos.com/2007/12/12/writings/#comment-7976</guid>
		<description>Oh, definitely!  I find it more fun to point out that even an internally consistent system has that minor hangup... plus I've been reading Paul Erdos' biography again  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, definitely!  I find it more fun to point out that even an internally consistent system has that minor hangup&#8230; plus I&#8217;ve been reading Paul Erdos&#8217; biography again  <img src='http://www.monakhos.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zach</title>
		<link>http://www.monakhos.com/2007/12/12/writings/#comment-7975</link>
		<dc:creator>Zach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 16:41:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.monakhos.com/2007/12/12/writings/#comment-7975</guid>
		<description>Yes. It doesn't necessarily have to be logically coherent, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes. It doesn&#8217;t necessarily have to be logically coherent, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A. Julie</title>
		<link>http://www.monakhos.com/2007/12/12/writings/#comment-7974</link>
		<dc:creator>A. Julie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 16:24:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.monakhos.com/2007/12/12/writings/#comment-7974</guid>
		<description>If morality is a logically coherent system, then one person's morals will easily disagree with anothers, if each has different base premises.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If morality is a logically coherent system, then one person&#8217;s morals will easily disagree with anothers, if each has different base premises.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.456 seconds -->
<!-- Cached page served by WP-Cache -->
