This entry was posted on Wednesday, December 12th, 2007 at 0:18 and is filed under Belief, Mysticism/Spirituality, Personal.
If morality is a logically coherent system, then one person’s morals will easily disagree with anothers, if each has different base premises.
Yes. It doesn’t necessarily have to be logically coherent, though.
Oh, definitely! I find it more fun to point out that even an internally consistent system has that minor hangup… plus I’ve been reading Paul Erdos’ biography again
“Absolutely relative”– love that!
Overall, I agree. My only quarrel is the first point as is, describes the “personal” monotheistic, God-as-entity view, but not God as Isness.
Sort of. That section does need some more elaboration. I plan on writing about that point more next to fill in some of the obvious holes it leaves.
Name (required)
Mail (will not be published) (required)
Website
December 12th, 2007 at 11:24
If morality is a logically coherent system, then one person’s morals will easily disagree with anothers, if each has different base premises.
December 12th, 2007 at 11:41
Yes. It doesn’t necessarily have to be logically coherent, though.
December 13th, 2007 at 11:56
Oh, definitely! I find it more fun to point out that even an internally consistent system has that minor hangup… plus I’ve been reading Paul Erdos’ biography again
December 16th, 2007 at 0:28
“Absolutely relative”– love that!
Overall, I agree. My only quarrel is the first point as is, describes the “personal” monotheistic, God-as-entity view, but not God as Isness.
December 16th, 2007 at 2:04
Sort of. That section does need some more elaboration. I plan on writing about that point more next to fill in some of the obvious holes it leaves.